Leaving aside the Muslim block-vote, the Greens seem to be very popular with our growing population of educated but not very intelligent people. This woman has got herself elected, and fair play to her for that, but her views (and the Green Party agenda points more widely) come over as childish and deeply unserious. How could it possibly translate as a platform for government? On a related topic, it will be interesting to see the turnout figures - some of those who will be complaining most vociferously about the outcome of elections may have to take their civic duties a little more seriously instead of just shrugging ‘can’t be bothered, they’re all the same’.
This is what really worries me about England. It seems very likely that it was the high turnout of Muslims that got the Green Party in. If the natives had bothered to vote in as high a numbers then Reform would have won. However we are so dispirited by a Govt/Elite that hate the deplorable natives that too many have already given up.
As Amelia would say "We must recover our courage and fight for our homeland"
I prefer the policy of the Monster Raving Looney Party on Border Controls: "We will replace employees of the Border Force with GP Receptionists. This will dramatically reduce the number of people getting in". Seems to be the only serious policy out there at the moment.
Polygamy is currently lawful if the marriages preceded arrival in the UK. In particular, benefits can be claimed for more than one wife. The suggestion for legalising polygamy is merely an extension therefore to domestic circumstances and no big deal surely. It also removes discrimination against our home grown Muslims who currenlty can't marry more than one woman. So unfair.
Polygamy also helps women. Given the subordinate status of women in Islam the life of married women is often one of domestic drudgery waiting on their masters. A second or third wife reduces the burden. Who can be against that?
So, overall, the suggestion is an excellent one. I'd be a little concerned over whether there are enough women to go around especially if the number of wives becomes a status symbol among men. Still, there are plenty of white, left wing, middle class women who might find being a second or third wife progressive and edgy. With them out of the way (behind burqas) it will be easier for the rest of us men to identify women we might actually want to get involved with. Yes, a win-win all round.
What about the age of consent, Laura? Shouldn't they bring it down to the traditional age of bulugh? It would guarantee them unswerving support of not just the muslim community but also of the entire British establishment - in all probability, all local councils and police would go green overnight and no more "election" formalities would ever be needed. All of those pesky reactionary restores would simply die off by themselves and Zach could rule Britain forever!
That and also introduce to the Yookay the Afghan dancing boys they have in Afghanistan. Start by opening a bar / club for boy lovers the infrastructures already there on Manchesters Anal Treet sorry Canal Street.
Perhaps a reduction in the age of consent to 9? Wasn't that Aisha's age when Muhammad 'consumated' the marriage? And the legalisation of Muslim men owning concubines (sex slaves). That should be sufficiently respectful towards their cultural differences.
This is the Achilles heel of democracy. It allows an entirely unscrupulous person to simply identify what their potential constituency wants and promise to give it to them, whatever it is, if they are elected. It doesn't matter if they cannot fulfill their promise because once elected they will end democracy. This has to be the result of a General Election win by the Greens because of the economic crisis that looms over us.
And Zolanski is unscrupulous. He really will say anything to get elected. His support for Islam shows this because he was born David Paulden and changed his name at the age of 18 to reclaim his Jewish heritage and to distance himself from his stepfather, who was also named David. He adopted the surname Polanski, his grandfather’s original name, and the first name Zack, inspired by a Jewish character in the novel Goodnight Mister Tom.
Starmer is actually making Polanski's victory easier by giving votes to 16 & 17 year-olds, the majority of whom will vote Green, and very few will vote reform or Conservative.
If this ghastly man succeeds, almost exactly 100 years after the Nazis took power, our country will be destroyed.
I dunno...I'm reminded about when accusing opponents of "spending like drunken sailors," or comparing them to "cheap whores." Followed by apologies to sailors and whores. Maybe apologies to actual polygamists may similarly be in order when the Green's are the opponents?
The apathetic and distracted constituency will be the downfall of those who want a nationalist, moral, prosperous and safe country, via their elected governments.
The 52% who abstained were the real culprits here. NYC saw the same type of apathy, with over 6 million not voting and in turn handing a ugandan jihadist the Mayor's seat.
This has to be a quick lesson for either or both of Restore and Reform, there on the island.
They were shown that they don't yet have what it takes to mobilize the most important voter block out there...the uninterested.
BTW, I agree that your suggestion about polygamy is their next move. The escalation of perversion and depravity is always the lure that snares those who are remotely opposed to any moral decency or behavior.
Howls from those who fail to distinguish between "legal" and "compulsory"...and who would see it as "a further step toward the Islamification of the UK."
Leaving aside the Muslim block-vote, the Greens seem to be very popular with our growing population of educated but not very intelligent people. This woman has got herself elected, and fair play to her for that, but her views (and the Green Party agenda points more widely) come over as childish and deeply unserious. How could it possibly translate as a platform for government? On a related topic, it will be interesting to see the turnout figures - some of those who will be complaining most vociferously about the outcome of elections may have to take their civic duties a little more seriously instead of just shrugging ‘can’t be bothered, they’re all the same’.
52% did not vote in Gorton and Denton, similar to last General Election.
My point exactly, thank you.
This is what really worries me about England. It seems very likely that it was the high turnout of Muslims that got the Green Party in. If the natives had bothered to vote in as high a numbers then Reform would have won. However we are so dispirited by a Govt/Elite that hate the deplorable natives that too many have already given up.
As Amelia would say "We must recover our courage and fight for our homeland"
Brilliant…the year will be special.
I prefer the policy of the Monster Raving Looney Party on Border Controls: "We will replace employees of the Border Force with GP Receptionists. This will dramatically reduce the number of people getting in". Seems to be the only serious policy out there at the moment.
Shes a useful idiot for the Pakistani Muslim rape gangs, their families & communities. A traitor, a liar and will reap what evil she sows.
Unfortunately it will probably be others who reap the evil not her.
Polygamy is currently lawful if the marriages preceded arrival in the UK. In particular, benefits can be claimed for more than one wife. The suggestion for legalising polygamy is merely an extension therefore to domestic circumstances and no big deal surely. It also removes discrimination against our home grown Muslims who currenlty can't marry more than one woman. So unfair.
Polygamy also helps women. Given the subordinate status of women in Islam the life of married women is often one of domestic drudgery waiting on their masters. A second or third wife reduces the burden. Who can be against that?
So, overall, the suggestion is an excellent one. I'd be a little concerned over whether there are enough women to go around especially if the number of wives becomes a status symbol among men. Still, there are plenty of white, left wing, middle class women who might find being a second or third wife progressive and edgy. With them out of the way (behind burqas) it will be easier for the rest of us men to identify women we might actually want to get involved with. Yes, a win-win all round.
What about the age of consent, Laura? Shouldn't they bring it down to the traditional age of bulugh? It would guarantee them unswerving support of not just the muslim community but also of the entire British establishment - in all probability, all local councils and police would go green overnight and no more "election" formalities would ever be needed. All of those pesky reactionary restores would simply die off by themselves and Zach could rule Britain forever!
This might be popular with different voting blocs.
That and also introduce to the Yookay the Afghan dancing boys they have in Afghanistan. Start by opening a bar / club for boy lovers the infrastructures already there on Manchesters Anal Treet sorry Canal Street.
Perhaps a reduction in the age of consent to 9? Wasn't that Aisha's age when Muhammad 'consumated' the marriage? And the legalisation of Muslim men owning concubines (sex slaves). That should be sufficiently respectful towards their cultural differences.
Oh damn I was making the same suggestion I"ll have to delete my comment.
This is the Achilles heel of democracy. It allows an entirely unscrupulous person to simply identify what their potential constituency wants and promise to give it to them, whatever it is, if they are elected. It doesn't matter if they cannot fulfill their promise because once elected they will end democracy. This has to be the result of a General Election win by the Greens because of the economic crisis that looms over us.
And Zolanski is unscrupulous. He really will say anything to get elected. His support for Islam shows this because he was born David Paulden and changed his name at the age of 18 to reclaim his Jewish heritage and to distance himself from his stepfather, who was also named David. He adopted the surname Polanski, his grandfather’s original name, and the first name Zack, inspired by a Jewish character in the novel Goodnight Mister Tom.
Starmer is actually making Polanski's victory easier by giving votes to 16 & 17 year-olds, the majority of whom will vote Green, and very few will vote reform or Conservative.
If this ghastly man succeeds, almost exactly 100 years after the Nazis took power, our country will be destroyed.
I dunno...I'm reminded about when accusing opponents of "spending like drunken sailors," or comparing them to "cheap whores." Followed by apologies to sailors and whores. Maybe apologies to actual polygamists may similarly be in order when the Green's are the opponents?
Hell. Why not make it compulsory?
The apathetic and distracted constituency will be the downfall of those who want a nationalist, moral, prosperous and safe country, via their elected governments.
The 52% who abstained were the real culprits here. NYC saw the same type of apathy, with over 6 million not voting and in turn handing a ugandan jihadist the Mayor's seat.
This has to be a quick lesson for either or both of Restore and Reform, there on the island.
They were shown that they don't yet have what it takes to mobilize the most important voter block out there...the uninterested.
BTW, I agree that your suggestion about polygamy is their next move. The escalation of perversion and depravity is always the lure that snares those who are remotely opposed to any moral decency or behavior.
Howls from those who fail to distinguish between "legal" and "compulsory"...and who would see it as "a further step toward the Islamification of the UK."